Legal Opinion

Loveless v. Erie Railroad

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal: Court of Appeals for Trumbull county.

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, William H. Loveless, claims that he is the owner of about 43 acres of land in this county; that under a grant made by Edward Moore, the then owner of this land, The Erie Railroad Company entered upon his land, erected a dam thereon and is using water therefrom, the railroad company agreeing to pay therefor $100 per annum. Plaintiff claims this money by reason of the devise of this land to him by will of Edward Moore.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover from the railroad company the amount due under this contract after the property vested in him. He made Samuel Q. Marsh,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Wagner v. NostrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Clarke v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Watson v. PennIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. West Shore Mills Co. v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Fisk v. BraymanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. LRC Realty, Inc. v. B.E.B. PropertiesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music EntertainmentSupreme Court of the United States · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API