Rome Railway & Light Co. v. Robinson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Per Ctjeiam.
It appears from the petition as amended that the alleged negligence of the defendant was not the effective and proximate cause of the homicide of the plaintiff’s husband, but that such cause was the intervening act of a separate and independent agency. It does not further appear from the petition that the intervening agency could have been reasonably anticipated or foreseen by the defendant, or that the alleged negligence of the defendant put in operation other causal forces which were the direct, natural, and probable consequences of such negligence. The petition, therefore,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gillespie v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Rome Railway & Light Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Higginbotham v. Rome Railway & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crosby v. Savannah Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Georgia Power Co. v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. WhiddonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Georgia Power Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Irwin v. Georgia Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.