Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Minneapolis v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 21, 1959No. Civ. No. 4-58-56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVITT, District Judge.

Plaintiff seeks recovery of $18,731.54 which, it alleges, was wrongfully taken by the United States when it levied on tax liens against accounts receivable owing a delinquent taxpayer. The plaintiff claims that it is entitled to this fund because the taxpayer assigned the same accounts to the plaintiff prior to the creation of the tax liens.

There are two issues. The first is whether the suit can be maintained against the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1) (1952) as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a)(1) (Supp.1958), or whether it should have been brought against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
  2. First National Bank of Emlenton, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James A. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. Hummell v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980
  3. St. Paul National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1970
  4. Ellison v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
  5. J. A. Peterson-Tomahawk Hills, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API