Legal Opinion
J. A. Peterson-Tomahawk Hills, Inc. v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 1, 1961No. KC-1470PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR J. STANLEY, Jr., District Judge.
The plaintiff is a residential real estate developer. In the course of the business of constructing and developing residential property, the plaintiff contracted with one Westpfahl for concrete work. It is alleged that Westpfahl was to furnish all labor and materials. Apparently, Westpfahl encountered difficulties, for it is alleged that on October 29, 1959, the plaintiff received notice from two ready-mix concrete companies that Westpfahl owed them a total of $6,357.36 for materials delivered to residential sites at which Westpfahl had performed work…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pennsylvania v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- First National Bank of Emlenton, Pa. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1959
- Rutledge v. RiddellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hummell v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980
- St. Paul National Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1970
- Ellison v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
- Chopak v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964