Legal Opinion

In re Turnbull

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 20, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

Upon tbe facts stated in the referee’s certificate, it is clear that this court cannot say that he was in error. The burden of showing that an article alleged to be exempt is within the provisions of the statute rests upon the bankrupt. Gay v. Southworth, 113 Mass. 333. It is not contended that a bankrupt can hold as exempt a watch of any imaginable value, however great, and there is nothing in the report of the referee to show what is the value of the watch in question. From statements made by counsel, however, the court is led to believe that the omission to find the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gay v. SouthworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. In Re MimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  3. Herzig v. Commercial State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. Lee Lun v. HenryHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  5. In re LuciusDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API