Legal Opinion
Golden West Credit & Adjustment Co. v. Peardon
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 1933No. Docket No. 4758PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover on a certain bond given to secure the release of an attachment previously issued. The bond sued upon, excluding the verification, is in the words and figures following, to wit:
“Whereas, the above named plaintiff has sued out an attachment in the above entitled action in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, against the above named defendants, by virtue of writ of attachment in the amount of $2,231.17, the following described property, to-wit: furniture and all personal property located in that certain building known as Wilson’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Poole v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- McCormick v. National Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- McCutcheon v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Heynemann v. EderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by1 opinion
- Golden West Credit & Adjustment Co. v. PeardonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934