Legal Opinion

Golden West Credit & Adjustment Co. v. Peardon

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 1, 1933No. Docket No. 4758PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover on a certain bond given to secure the release of an attachment previously issued. The bond sued upon, excluding the verification, is in the words and figures following, to wit:

“Whereas, the above named plaintiff has sued out an attachment in the above entitled action in the City and County of San Francisco, State of California, against the above named defendants, by virtue of writ of attachment in the amount of $2,231.17, the following described property, to-wit: furniture and all personal property located in that certain building known as Wilson’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Poole v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. McCormick v. National Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. McCutcheon v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Heynemann v. EderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golden West Credit & Adjustment Co. v. PeardonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API