In re the Claim of Gulack
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s ¡finding that Louis Masheb was an employee of appellant rather than an independent contractor, thus making appellant liable for unemployment contributions. The question of whether an employment relationship existed between Masheb and appellant is factual, and thus for us to disturb the board’s decision we must find, on the basis of the record before us that, as a matter of law, no employment relationship existed (Labor Law, § 623; e.g., Matter of Stork…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. BolandNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re the Claim of MorgensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- In re StotzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In re the Claim of Realty Hotels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chernofsky v. ChernofskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re Concourse Opthalmology Associates, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982