Legal Opinion

State v. Jenson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1929No. 4769PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, District Judge.

The defendant was convicted of obtaining three stock certificates representing stock in the Tintic Standard Mining Company from said company by false pretenses, under the first count of an information which reads as follows:

“That the said David Jenson on the 22nd day of January, A. D. 1925, at the County of Salt Lake, State of Utah, wilfully, unlawfully, knowingly, designedly and feloniously, and with intent to cheat and defraud the Tintic Standard Mining Company, a Utah corporation, of its personal property hereinafter described, did falsely and fraudulently pretend and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Ridley & JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  2. State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. McCormackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. West v. Tintic Standard Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loveday v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. State v. TimmermanUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. McNaughtanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ballaine v. District Court of First Judicial District for Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API