Albert Kenneth Bankston v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Albert Kenneth Bankston has appealed from the district court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motiop to vacate his judgment of conviction and sentence. 1 We affirm.
The appellant is attacking his conviction and sentence for armed bank robbery, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d). He was convicted upon trial by jury; and the judgment was affirmed on di rect appeal. United States v. Bankston, 5th Cir. 1970, 424 F.2d 714.
The appellant contends that the indictment is fatally defective because it fails to name the persons whose lives were put in jeopardy during the robbery. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Anthony Angelet and William AngeletCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- William Sterling Rosecrans, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Archie Raymond Streator v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Albert Kenneth Bankston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970