Legal Opinion
Fields v. Howes
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2010No. 09-1215PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLSTER, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which CLAY, J., joined. McKEAGUE, J. (pp. 824-28), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
DAN AARON POLSTER, District Judge.
Appellant appeals the district court’s conditional grant of the petition of writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court found that the Michigan Court of Appeals unreasonably applied established federal law in determining that a confession made by Appellee was properly admitted into evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Appellee Randall Lee…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Campbell v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Craig Wilson v. Burl Cain, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MelanconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.