Legal Opinion
Marotta v. Village of Keeseville
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 21, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.
Appeal from an order of *863the Supreme Court (Plumadore, J.), entered October 13, 1989 in Clinton County, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff commenced this declaratory judgment action seeking to have a resolution adopted by defendants, pertaining to eligibility requirements to receive funds from a Federal housing rehabilitation grant, declared unconstitutional. Following a motion by defendants for summary judgment, Supreme Court dismissed the complaint finding both that plaintiff lacked standing to bring…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sam & Mary Housing Corp. v. Jo/Sal Market Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- 154 East Park Avenue Corp. v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sam & Mary Housing Corp. v. Jo/Sal Market Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Chrysler Realty Corp. v. Urban Investing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Winner v. CuomoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Schulz v. Lake George Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Charles BB.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992