In re Atkinson-Clark Canal Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DeNNY, J.,
after stating the facts as above: The appellant contends that its petition to the Clerk of the Superior Court to have its assessments docketed as a lien upon the lands of the respective respondents was based on the law as set out in the first paragraph of Gr.S. 156-43, unaffected by the amendments thereto enacted by Chapter 180, Public Laws of 1939. Therefore, it argues and contends that there was nothing for the Clerk to pass upon, and that it was the duty of the Clerk to docket the assessments and if the respondents were dissatisfied therewith, they had the right to appeal and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina Railroad v. StorySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Moore v. . PackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Brittain v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Cameron v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Bank v. . LeveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Worthington v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- In re ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Meehan v. CableCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Peak Coastal Ventures, L.L.C. v. Suntrust BankNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- Brown v. PatelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.