Legal Opinion
Monterey Coastkeeper v. State Water Res. Control Bd.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 18, 2018No. C080530PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuarte, J.
*346The Central Coast Region is one of the great agricultural regions of California. Unfortunately, waste discharges from irrigated agricultural operations, particularly from the use of fertilizers and pesticides, have impaired the quality of both surface water and groundwater in the region. The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) and nine regional boards are responsible for regulating waste discharges to protect water quality. ( Wat. Code, § 13263.)1 Discharge requirements may *144be waived "if the state board or a regional board determines ... that the waiver is consistent with any…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sierra Club v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barclay Hollander Corp. v. Cal. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. Cnty. of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Barclay Hollander Corp. v. Cal. Regional Water Quality Control etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Cleveland Nat. Forest Foundation v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Cleveland Nat. Forest Foundation v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.