Legal Opinion

Willard Joye v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1968No. 12442_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

Willard Joye slipped and fell on a banana in defendant’s A & P supermarket. In his diversity suit in the district court the jury returned a verdict for him in the amount of $10,000 and defendant appeals. We reverse because we are unable to find in the record sufficient evidence 1 to present a jury issue as to constructive notice to defendant of a dangerous condition. Without such notice, in the context of the case, and under South Carolina law which we must apply, the district court should have granted defendant’s Rule 50(b) motion for judgment n. o. v.

Joye came to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wratchford v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  2. Hunter v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Bagwell v. McLellan Stores Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  4. Baker v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Mullinax v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. Toys-R-US IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  2. Sipple v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API