Legal Opinion

Consolidated Wagon & Machine Co. v. Wright

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1920No. 3205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, First District, Box Elder County; J. D. Gall, Judge. Action by the Consolidated Wagon & Machine Company against H. G-. Wright. Verdict and judgment lor defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFeick, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action against defendant to recover the purchase price of what is called a Massey-Harris harvester. In its complaint the plaintiff in substance alleged that on the 3d day of May, 1916, it sold to the defendant a harvester for the sum of $950, which sum the defendant agreed to pay as follows: $60 when the harvester was delivered, $450 on November 1, 1916, and the remainder on November 1, 1917 — that said harvester was sold pursuant to the terms of a certain contract and warranty which are attached to and made a part of the complaint; that the defendant had failed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Wagon & Machine Co. v. BarbenUtah Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co., Inc. v. StohlUtah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API