Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Rogers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1940No. 27971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

October 25, 1938, the city of Seattle filed before the police judge for Seattle precinct a complaint charging the defendant, E. Rogers, with violation of § 276 of city ordinance No. 48022, as amendéd by ordinance No. 66974. The section above referred to reads as follows:

“It shall be unlawful for any person either as principal, managing agent or supervisor, or as solicitor, collector or salesman, to solicit, collect or receive money or property, or to solicit the sale of or to sell an article or thing or ticket of any kind where it is represented that the proceeds of such solicitation and/or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State v. PitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Cornelius v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Smith v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Tacoma v. FoxWashington Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of Park RidgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
  2. Madison v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. The National Foundation v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Adams v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Schroeder v. WeighallWashington Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API