Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stanton v. Murray

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1952No. 28,909, 28,943PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Relator and appellant herein, David P. Stanton, is the prosecuting attorney of Lake County, Indiana, and will hereafter be referred to as appellant.

Respondent herein, William J. Murray, is judge of the Lake Criminal Court and, for convenience, will hereafter be referred to as appellee when discussing both the original action and appeal.

*226Both are, and were, during the time of the alleged acts herein, candidates for re-election to their respective offices.

The original action, cause numbered 28,909, and appeal, cause numbered 28,943, are concerned with the same subject matter, and involve the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Pennekamp v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Craig v. HechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Circuit Court for Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gallagher v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. LaGRANGE ETC. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. David Jones v. Rodney CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. Hopping v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Skolnick v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API