Legal Opinion

Bruton v. Biomet, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 7, 2019No. 3:16-cv-00135Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JANICE BRUTON, ) ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) Case No. 3:16-CV-135 RLM-MGG ) BIOMET, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants ) OPINIONS AND ORDER Biomet moved for summary judgment in this case as a sanction for the plaintiffs’ failure to preserve the M2a device that she alleges was defective and caused her injuries. Today, I deny the motion. Summary judgment is only appropriate if the pleadings, discovery materials, disclosures, and affidavits demonstrate that there are no genuine issues of material fact, and that the non-moving…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Trask-Morton v. Motel 6 Operating L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Marrocco v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API