State v. Louthan
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, J.
¶1 At a bench trial on stipulated facts, the trial court found Darrin L. Louthan guilty of unlawful possession of methamphetamine, contrary to RCW 69.50.4013(1). Louthan appeals his conviction, asserting that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to arrest him for possession of drug paraphernalia and, thus, the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress the evidence seized incident to his arrest. In this appeal, we also address the applicability of the rules announced in Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 129 S. Ct. 1710, 173 L. Ed. 2d 485 (2009), and State v. Patton, 167 Wn.2d…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KnutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. KNUTZCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.