Legal Opinion

Vincioni v. Phelps Dodge Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1930No. 3328PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

This action for malicious prosecution is the aftermath of State v. Vincioni, 30 N. M. 472, 239 P. 281, where most of the essential facts will be found stated.

At the close of plaintiff’s case the trial court directed a verdict for defendants, ruling that plaintiff had failed in proof of want of probable cause. The correctness of the ruling is the only question before us.

This court has held that want of probable cause is an element of a cause of action for malicious prosecution; that the plaintiff has the burden of proof; and that, the facts being undisputed, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nehr v. DobbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Meraz v. ValenciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Cobbey v. State Journal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. State v. VincioniNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lind v. SchmidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  2. Ysasi v. BrownDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
  3. Mendoza v. K-Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  4. Yucca Ford, Inc. v. ScarsellaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Marchbanks v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API