Legal Opinion

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Gatti

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 1985No. 77972; CA A32444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

SAIF appeals from a judgment dismissing its civil action for money had and received. The issue is whether the complaint alleges ultimate facts sufficient to state a claim. ORCP 21A(8). Assuming that the well pleaded facts in SAIF’s complaint are true, Sager v. McClenden, 296 Or 33, 35, 672 P2d 697 (1983), we conclude as a matter of law that SAIF’s complaint fails to state a claim. Therefore, we affirm.

Respondents represented a workers’ compensation claimant before a hearings referee, who found that the claimant was permanently partially disabled and awarded respondents $800 as attorney fees…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Franklin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MaddoxOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wisherd v. Paul Koch Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API