State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Gatti
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
SAIF appeals from a judgment dismissing its civil action for money had and received. The issue is whether the complaint alleges ultimate facts sufficient to state a claim. ORCP 21A(8). Assuming that the well pleaded facts in SAIF’s complaint are true, Sager v. McClenden, 296 Or 33, 35, 672 P2d 697 (1983), we conclude as a matter of law that SAIF’s complaint fails to state a claim. Therefore, we affirm.
Respondents represented a workers’ compensation claimant before a hearings referee, who found that the claimant was permanently partially disabled and awarded respondents $800 as attorney fees…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Franklin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. MaddoxOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Wisherd v. Paul Koch Volkswagen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987