Hendricks v. Total Quality Logistics, LLC
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. Doc. 223. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.1
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Robert Hendricks and Scott Spitler filed this action against Total Quality Logistics (“TQL”) and Kenneth Oaks2 asserting a collective claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and a class action claim under the Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Act…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Life After Hate, Inc. v. Free Radicals Project Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Price v. Medicaid DirectorDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. Traffic Tech, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021