Legal Opinion

Zetzer v. Lundgard

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1953No. 264PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConn, J.

This appeal to this court is on questions of law and fact and is submitted on the pleadings, the original papers, a transcript of the docket and journal entries and, also, a transcript of the evidence offered by plaintiff, the exhibits, and the oral arguments and briefs of counsel.

An amendment to plaintiff’s second amended petition was filed in this court and defendants filed herein their amended answer, to which plaintiff filed a reply.

Plaintiff’s second amended petition is voluminous and somewhat repititions. In their amended answer, defendants allege that plaintiff does not have the legal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. v. BucsiOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Village of Hicksville v. LantzOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. McGilvery v. ShadelOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Fischer v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Scott v. SnyderOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ohio Multi-Use Trails Ass'n v. Vinton County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. McMillanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1958
  3. Sparrow v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Armate Associates, Ltd. v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Porter v. City of OberlinOhio Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API