Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Forrest
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 28, 1940No. 35361PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
On a previous occasion this cause was entertained by us find remanded to the lower court for .the introduction of a certain, map, or plat, of a previous survey made .in pursuance to an order of the trial- court and the procés verbal therein. We suggested at that time that a new survey' be made in accordance with j^he description given in the' defendant’s' deed, with the view of establishing the boundary line be tween plaintiff and defendant because the description given in plaintiff’s deed was not sufficient to establish it. Hunter v. Forrest, 183 La. 434, 164 So. 163.
This…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leader Realty Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Bendernagel v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. AngellozSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Soule v. WestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Hunter v. ForrestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Boyet v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Forrest v. MessengerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
- Bryson v. GeorgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hunter v. ForrestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.