Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Forrest

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1935No. 29829PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURNET, Justice.

Plaintiffs instituted a petitory action to recover from the defendant possession of a certain tract of land described as follows:

“Also another tract being in the Western portion of what is known as the Crane Tract, beginning on the west of said tract at a point where the lands of J. D. Gourney and F. H. Neal join said tract and run northwest on the line between the Neal and Crane tract the distance of fourteen chains; thence East to the center of the Lake; thence down the drain of said lake to the aforementioned Canal; thence up said Canal and around the margin of the Lake to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Broussard v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  3. Adams v. DrewsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  4. Passera v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  5. Breaux v. RoyerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chachere v. Superior Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Fitzgerald v. HylandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  3. Hunter v. ForrestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  4. Forrest v. MessengerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Prather v. ValienLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API