State v. Pacific Health Center, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
¶1 The trial court granted the State’s motion for partial summary judgment, ruling that the defendants violated the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, because their alternative health care practice, based primarily on electrodermal testing (EDT), constituted the unlicensed practices of medicine, naturopathy, and acupuncture. The defendants appealed both the trial court’s ruling and the penalty it imposed, arguing the award was excessive.
¶2 We agree with the trial court’s ruling that, although the defendants use alternative practice methods and terminology, their actual…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Endicott v. SaulCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Kabbae v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Kabbae v. DEPART. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SER.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.