Legal Opinion

State v. Ladwig

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1989No. 16039PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

Appellant Milo Ladwig (Ladwig) appeals his conviction of driving with 0.10 percent or more of alcohol in his blood, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) failing to dismiss the charges against him at the conclusion of State’s evidence and (2) refusing certain proposed jury instructions. Because State failed to introduce any evidence of Ladwig’s blood alcohol content at the time he was operating his vehicle, we reverse.

FACTS

Ladwig was stopped at a traffic check in Codington County, South Dakota. He was unable to produce his driver’s license. Because of his appearance and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. ColturiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  5. Haas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API