Legal Opinion
Reed v. Insituform Technologies, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 3, 2014No. Civil No. 12-89 (DWF/LIB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. *1024Defendant, Insituform Technologies, Inc. (“Insituform” or “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 33.) Plaintiffs, Gary Reed and Tom Vevea, as Trustees of the Minnesota Laborers Health and Welfare Fund and Minnesota Laborers Pension Fund; James Brady and Keith Kramer, as Trustees of the Minnesota Laborers Vacation Fund; Gary Reed, as Trustee of the Construction Laborers’ Education, Training, and Apprenticeship Fund of Minnesota and North…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Heimerl v. Tech Electric of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Bigham v. R&S Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund v. RoadSafe Traffic Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Nilsen v. Master Floors of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2025