Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1902No. 2525PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the theft of a hog, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a 'term of four years.

The facts adduced on the trial are substantially as follows: Appellant, with his two codefendants, the Cashes, agreed to steal the hog of the prosecuting witness Cogburn; that appellant furnished one of the Cashes with a gun, and told him to go and shoot the hog, which was running in the Cogburn pasture; that Cash took the gun, went into the pasture, shot and tilled the hog, but did nothing with reference to its asportation except to hide the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Dawson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Tittle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Martin v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Silvas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Avila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Burow, Jr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Hardie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API