Legal Opinion

United States v. Begay

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2011No. 10-2068PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

Defendant/Appellant Toby Begay, a convicted sex offender, appeals the district court’s modification of the conditions of his supervised release to include clinical polygraph testing. Title 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) sets forth the conditions and procedures under which a district court may modify conditions of supervised release. Begay argues that a district court does not have authority to modify conditions of supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2) unless the government can justify the modification by showing that circumstances have changed since the original…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Karl P. ZinnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Jeffrey A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. LamirandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Tyree Neal, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. RodebaughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. ParisiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Charles MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API