Legal Opinion

Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Hendon

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 7, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case 53 — Action by G. A. Hendon against the Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company for Damages for Discontinuing the Use of the Telephone in Plaintiff’s House. — J'an. 7, 1903, APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, COMMON PLEAS DIVISION. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendant Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

*502Opinion op the court by

JUDGE HOBSON

— Reversing.

Appellee, Hendon, is a physician, living in Louisville. He was a patron of the appellant, the Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Company, and had one of its instruments in his office. Appellant discontinued the telephone from 3 o’clock p. m. of October 23, 1900, to 8:45 a. m. the next morning, or something less than 18 hours, and this action was brought to recover damages therefor. The reason the telephone was disconnected was that the bookkeeper made a mistake in posting the amount paid. His book did not show that Hendon had paid for the month of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. Co. v. ClayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. CarlessSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. Harbaugh v. Citizens Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Citizens Telephone Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
  5. Litchman v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API