Legal Opinion
United States v. Durham
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2010No. 09-2951PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Michael Durham appeals the sentence of 151 months’ imprisonment he received from the district court after pleading guilty to knowingly receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). Durham contends the district court erred by applying a two-level enhancement for distributing child pornography pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) *923§ 2G2.2(b)(3)(F). He also challenges certain conditions of supervised release imposed by the district court. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
Michael Durham was charged in an eight-count…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. StultsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Gregory SofskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. LaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Scott RistineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Thomas MickelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Max BudziakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MoraisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Joseph PiroskoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Eric VallejosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.