Legal Opinion

Estribou v. Alma Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1954No. Docket Nos. 4697, 4698PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

These consolidated actions to quiet title involve the same legal questions in relation to certain claimed gas and oil interests in real property in Kern County.

In the Estribou case the plaintiff alleged that he was the owner of an undivided one-half interest in all oil, gas, and other hydrocarbon substances within or underlying the described land. In the case of L and B Producing and Drilling Company (hereinafter referred to as L & B) the plaintiffs alleged that they were the owners of an undivided 4% per cent interest therein. In both cases the defendants denied the title of plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Elbert, Ltd. v. GrossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Moran v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Spring Valley Water Co. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. McCracken v. HummelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atlantic Oil Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Edwards v. City of Santa PaulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Kaufman v. Gross & Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API