Legal Opinion

Ruan Financial Corp. v. United States

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided December 27, 1990No. Civ. No. 88-1711-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RULINGS

VIETOR, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Ruan Financial Corporation and Ruan Transport Corporation (jointly referred to as “Ruan”) brings suit seeking a refund of federal manufacturer’s excise taxes, interest and penalties, on 12 highway tractors. Defendant United States of America counterclaims seeking federal manufacturer’s excise taxes, plus interest and penalties, on an additional 414 highway tractors. Both parties move for summary judgment. I heard oral arguments and the motions are submitted.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ingram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Lester J. Trnka v. Elanco Products Co., a Division of Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruan Financial Corporation, Ruan Transport Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. Fitzgerald Truck Parts and Sales, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API