Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Burton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1973No. 7321SC605PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

“[A] judgment merges the cause of action upon which it was rendered, and becomes itself the obligation.” 2 McIntosh, N. C. Practice and Procedure 2d, § 1735. Therefore, plaintiff’s original cause of action, in which he sought recovery of damages for injuries to his property allegedly caused by defendants’ negligence, became merged into the consent judgment dated 6 January 1973. Where a judgment directs a party to perform a specific act and the party fails to comply within the time specified, various methods by which enforcement of the judgment may be effected are set forth in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mauney v. MauneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. United Artists Records, Inc. v. Eastern Tape Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Behr v. BehrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Dodson v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Price v. HornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Jones v. WrightCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API