Legal Opinion

United States v. Test

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1976No. Nos. 73-1337, 75-1773, 75-2001 and 75-1899PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Chief Judge.

The above-captioned cases were consolidated for consideration of defendants’1 in*581dividual challenges to the jury selection plan adopted by the district court for the District of Colorado as violative of the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1861 et seq., as amended (the Act), and the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution. Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court in Test v. United States, 420 U.S. 28, 95 S.Ct. 749, 42 L.Ed.2d 786, defendants were allowed to inspect both the master and qualified jury wheels and the qualifying…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. State v. TillmanUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Grigsby v. MabryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API