Legal Opinion

Schmidt & Ziegler v. First National Bank

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1897No. 1242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

The record now before us does not differ in any essential particular from the one on which the case was heard when it was before us on a former appeal. There is no new question to be examined nor can it be expected that we shall review or reconsider the legal propositions then determined. The opinion which may be found in 6 Colo. Court of Appeals, 216, remains the law of the case. According to the decision of our supreme court when the law has been once declared, the opinion must control on any subsequent hearing and be practically treated as res judicata. Lee v. Stahl, 13 Colo. 174; Routt et…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Means v. Bank of RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Scott v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Salazar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Jordan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  5. Routt v. Greenwood Cemetery Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lampman v. LampingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API