Fraser v. Oakdale Lumber & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. 0.
— In the complaint filed in this case there are set forth several distinct causes of action. The first is on account for work and labor alleged to have been performed by plaintiff for defendant at its special instance and request. The others are on account for work and labor alleged to have been performed by other parties for the defendant at its especial instance and request, and by such parties sold and transferred to the plaintiff.
After • setting out these several causes of action and their assignment to the plaintiff, the complaint then proceeds:—
“ Plaintiff, further…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bernero v. South British & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by6 opinions
- City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- McGinn v. ReesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Hershenson v. HershensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- E. Solé & Co., S. en C. v. RocafortSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
- Porter v. Alamocitos Land & Livestock Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.