Legal Opinion

Succession of Drysdale

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1908No. 17,303Published

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. In the matter of the succession of Julia P. Drysdale. From a judgment refusing probate to the will propounded, the executors appeal.

1Opinion

On the Merits.

LAND, J.

The pleadings and issues in this case are set forth in Succession of Drysdale, 121 La. 816, 46 South. 873, and need not be repeated. The cause was nonsuited for the purpose of giving the executors an opportunity to probate the alleged original will of Mrs. Drysdale in the court below.

In July, 1908, the executors produced said alleged original will, and, after notice to the heirs at law, proceeded to probate the same. After hearing the evidence and argument, the judge took the matter under advisement, and on July 31, 1908, rendered judg-’ ment refusing to probate the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Succession of RobertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1842
  2. Succession of HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
  3. Poydras v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  4. Succession of DrysdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API