Legal Opinion
Holloman v. Watt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1983No. 82-3096PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
708 F.2d 1399
Steven Mark HOLLOMAN; Michael James Holloman; David
Emerson, Jr.; and Jeffrey Todd Emerson; Minor,
by his father and next friend, David
Emerson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
James WATT, Secretary of the Department of Interior; Forest
Girard, Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Indian Affairs;
Sidney Mils, Acting Commissioner of the Bureau of Indian
Affairs; United States Department of Interior; Bureau of
Indian Affairs, a subdivision of the United States
Department of Interior, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 82-3096.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1983.
Deci…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Clemente v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Kennerly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Rosette, Inc. v. United States of Department of the InteriorNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Keith L. Prescott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.