Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cooper

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1995No. 93-SC-618-DG, 93-SC-1021-DGPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Justice.

The question before the Court is whether Section Eleven of the Constitution of Kentucky or a viable doctrine of the common law requires suppression of a confession coerced or improperly obtained by private parties. Prevailing decisional law answers firmly in the negative (Peek v. Commonwealth, Ky., 415 S.W.2d 854 (1967)), and is in accord with controlling precedent interpreting the Constitution of the United States. Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 107 S.Ct. 515, 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986).1 Despite the foregoing, *76the trial court held that Section Eleven of the Constitution of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wilson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Newman v. StinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mills v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Adkins v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Welch v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Fields v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Sabo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API