Legal Opinion

National Metal Edge Box Co. v. Hub

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Ohio County. Action by the National Metal Edge Box Company against The Hub. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

Judgment for plaintiff having- been rendered on a verdict accompanied by answers to special interrogatories, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

Plaintiff received an order from defendant for eleven thousand pasteboard boxes to be used for the purpose of containing clothing and other merchandise in which defendant’s customers could carry away purchases made by them. The order was for three sizes to be made of. gray granite jute board, (same material as defendant had for several years purchased from plaintiff) with certain printing, “printed top and bottom as had (formerly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Peninsular Land Transportation & Manufacturing Co. v. Franklin Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cox v. RatcliffeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woods v. StevensonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. CHARLESTON NAT. BANK OF CHARLESTON v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Charleston National Bank v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Prager v. City of WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pettes v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API