Gonzalez v. Fairgale Properties Co., N.V.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
Now pending before the Court are motions to dismiss by Defendants, Herman E. Hill, Jr. and C. Breckenridge Debnam. Specifically, Hill and Debnam move to dismiss the complaint for failure to comply with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 23.1 and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). The motions have been fully briefed and oral argument was held on August 2, 2002. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the Defendants’ motions.
I
This case arises out of a challenge to the enforceability of a contract for sale of land…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- CLARENCE JACKSON v. ROBERT GEORGEDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Miller v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Jones v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
- Chandler v. Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Minogue v. ModellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.