Legal Opinion

American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 25, 2012No. 11-1179PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

A Montana state law provides that a “corporation may not make ... an expenditure in connection with a candidate or a political committee that supports or opposes a candidate or a political party.” Mont. Code Ann. § 13-35-227(1) (2011). The Montana Supreme Court rejected petitioners’ claim that this statute violates the First Amendment. 2011 MT 328, 363 Mont. 220, 271 P. 3d 1. In Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm’n, 558 U. S. 310 (2010), this Court struck down a similar federal law, holding that “political speech does not lose First Amendment protection simply because its source is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Doug Lair v. Steve BullockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Wisconsin Right to Life State v. Timothy VockeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Catholic Ldrship Coaltn of TX v. David ReisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. Western Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMontana Supreme Court · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API