United States v. Meadows
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
WISS, Judge:
1. At a general court-martial convened at Royal Air Force Mildenhall, United Kingdom, appellant pleaded not guilty to charges that he had stolen $1,600.00 from the United States; that he had tried to impede an investigation by threatening a witness; and that he had solicited yet another witness to make a false official statement. See Arts. 121 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 934, respectively. Ultimately, the members found appellant not guilty of threatening a witness but convicted him of the remaining charges and sentenced him to a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1994
- United States v. WatsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. RoblesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. SebringNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. TsoNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016