Railway Mail Ass'n v. Moseley
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; Jno. E. McCall, Judge. Action by Mollie Moseley and others against the Railway Mail Association. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLISTER, District Judge.
This case involves the construction of a clause in a contract of insurance, issued by Railway Mail Association, plaintiff in error, to Emmett F. Moseley, a railway mail clerk at Memphis, Tenn., by which it was agreed, among other things, that if the insured should receive bodily injuries, resulting in death from such injuries alone, within 180 days therefrom, during the continuance of the insurance, through external, violent, and accidental means, the defendant would pay his sisters, the defendants in error, $4,000, less such sum as might have been paid as weekly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Utter v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Taliaferro v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Murray v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Bradley v. . the Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Employers' Indemnity Corp. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Szymanska v. Equitable Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
- Piotrowski v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Fabian v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Ingle v. W.O.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.