Legal Opinion
Carnley v. Cochran
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 30, 1962No. 158Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
369 U.S. 506 (1962)
CARNLEY
v.
COCHRAN, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
No. 158.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued February 20-21, 1962.
Decided April 30, 1962.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
By appointment of the Court, 368 U. S. 806, Harold A. Ward III argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for respondent by special leave of Court, pro hac vice. With him on the brief was Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General.
2Opinion of the Court · BrennanJustice Brennan
The petitioner, who was not afforded the assistance of counsel for his defense at his trial, claims…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Black; Concurrence · Douglas.
3Cases cited62 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.