Legal Opinion
Young v. Destaso Funding, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 14, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On November 20, 2009, four days after the appellants served a verified answer to the complaint, the plaintiffs counsel filed a note of issue and certificate of readiness affirming that “[d]iscovery proceedings now known to be necessary completed,” “[t]here are no outstanding requests for discovery,” and “[t]here has been a reasonable opportunity to complete the foregoing proceedings.”
The plaintiffs certificate of readiness incorrectly stated that discovery proceedings known to be necessary were completed and that there had been a reasonable opportunity to complete *779discovery proceedings.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gregory v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hyman & Gilbert v. GreensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Gaskin v. IlowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barrett v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Greco v. Wellington Leasing Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Taylor v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- Herrera v. Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Herrera v. Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013