Legal Opinion

Gaskin v. Ilowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs certificate of readiness incorrectly stated that the bill of particulars, physical examinations, exchange of medical reports, and any discovery proceedings known to be necessary were waived. In addition, it falsely declared that preliminary proceedings had been completed and that the case was ready for trial. Because of these misstatements of material facts, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate the note of issue was properly granted (Brown v Astoria Fed. Sav., 51 AD3d 961, 962 [2008]; see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; Gregory v Ford Motor Credit Co., 298 AD2d 496,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Astoria Federal SavingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Gregory v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Spilky v. TRW, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greco v. Wellington Leasing Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Young v. Destaso Funding, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API