Legal Opinion

State v. Gordian

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 2006No. 990210CR; A125945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of three counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, based on his plea of guilty, and was sentenced on each offense to a 20-month presumptive prison term, with each sentence to run consecutively. Defendant argued to the sentencing court, and reasserts on appeal, that the court could not impose consecutive sentences based on facts neither found by a jury nor admitted by defendant, citing Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004). We need not reach the question whether, as a general matter, the rule of law announced in Blakely applies…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. Herrera-LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Calderon-OrtizCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. Cazarez-LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API